engleski

Catch-as-catch-can: an uncatchable dance/life

Ideja zaštite nematerijalnih dobara - glazbe, plesa i slično - kao želja da se i ta "neuhvatljiva" dobra u vrijednosnom smislu izjednače s materijalnim kulturnim dobrima i spomenicima, da im se dade "težina" i "prava vrijednost", svakako su pozitivna nastojanja. Međutim, pitanja koja se nameću u vezi s promjenjivošću tih dobara, njihovim stvarnim životom i razvojem, upozoravaju i upućuju na oprez svih sudionika u procesu odlučivanja i stvaranja kriterija o tome što se štiti i zašto. Treba li štititi ples i glazbu ili ljude koji plešu ili glazbuju? I na koji način? Remembering that the idea of the safeguarding of the immaterial assets music, dance and the like is in fact a desire that those untouchable treasures should be at the same quality level with the material cultural assets and monuments, that they got the same "weight" and "real value", than I can understand it as a positive intentions. However, the questions raised regarding the changeable character of these assets, their real life and evolution, send a message to warn all the participants of the process of deciding and determining of the criteria that defines what are we protecting and why, to be cautious. Do we have to safeguard dance and music, or the people who are dancing and making music? And in what way?

safeguarding; immaterial assets; dance tanac; Krk

nije evidentirano