Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Comparative evaluation of four rapid quantitative D-dimer assays (CROSBI ID 501591)

Prilog sa skupa u časopisu | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Coen, Desiree ; Zovko, Vlasta ; Živković, Marcela ; Zadro, Renata Comparative evaluation of four rapid quantitative D-dimer assays // Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis / Mannucci, Pier Mannuccio (ur.). 2003

Podaci o odgovornosti

Coen, Desiree ; Zovko, Vlasta ; Živković, Marcela ; Zadro, Renata

engleski

Comparative evaluation of four rapid quantitative D-dimer assays

Nowadays, different rapid and fully automated quantitative D-Dimer assays, majority of them being latex-enhanced photometric immunoassays (LPIA), are commercially available. The main problems are that they display variable reactivity with differently sized cross-linked fibrin derivatives, as well as variable influence of fibrinogen degradation products on assay results. The aim of this study was to compare the analytical performance of four rapid and quantitative D-Dimer assays based on different methodology: one membrane-based immunofiltration assay (IFA) and three latex-enhanced photometric immunoassays (LPIA), and to find out if there is a correlation with total fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products (TDP) measured by ELISA assay. D-dimer concentrations were measured in fresh plasma samples of 40 patients with request for the determination of d-dimer, using the NycoCard D-dimer (Axis-Shield) on NycoCard READER and IL Test D-dimer (Instrumentation Laboratory) on ACL 9000. Samples were frozen for later measurement of d-dimer with the D-Dimer PLUS assay (Dade Behring) on a BCS analyzer, STA-Liatest D-DI (Diagnostica Stago) on STA Compact and for the measurement of TDP with Fibrinostika TDP (BioMérieux). The measurements included all available assay specific controls. Of the four assays performed, at least one resulted in discrepant results in 16/40 (40%) samples tested. The samples were separated into four groups according to NycoCard results: group I, <0.3 mg/L ; group II, 0.3-0.6 mg/L ; group III, 0.7-1.2 mg/L ; group IV, >1.2 mg/L. All assays gave comparable results for samples in group IV. Majority of the results were comparable in group III, except for 4 samples that were falsely negative: 1 with STA Liatest D-DI and 3 with IL Test D-Dimer. The greatest discrepancy between results was found just above the NycoCard cut-off value (in the range of 0.3-0.6 mg/L) in 9/12 samples in group II. Between five samples with normal NycoCard D-Dimer values (group I.), we found three falsely positive results: 1 with STA Liatest D-DI and 2 with D-Dimer PLUS assay. The relationship between TDP and D-Dimer assays showed correlation coefficients (r) as follows: 0.736 for NycoCard, 0.859 for IL Test D-Dimer, 0.596 for D-Dimer PLUS and 0.867 for STA Liatest D-DI. As discrepancies in the obtained results can be due to different calibrators and different monoclonal antibodies used, the follow-up of patients should be always performed with the same assay system, until the common calibrator is available.

quantitative assay; D-dimers; evaluation

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

2003.

nije evidentirano

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis

Mannucci, Pier Mannuccio

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

1538-7933

Podaci o skupu

Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (19 ; 2003)

poster

12.07.2003-18.07.2003

Birmingham, Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo

Povezanost rada

Temeljne medicinske znanosti

Indeksiranost