How metonymic are metaphors? (CROSBI ID 31239)
Prilog u knjizi | izvorni znanstveni rad
Podaci o odgovornosti
Günter, Radden,
engleski
How metonymic are metaphors?
Metonymy and metaphor are assumed to form a continuum with fuzzy cases between these categories. The paper focuses on the intermediate notion of metonymy-based metaphor. Four sources which may give rise to metonymy-based metaphor are distinguished: (i) a common experiential basis of source and target domain, due to the relationships of correlation and complementarity, (ii) conversational implicature, illustrated in the areas of implicated result and causation, implicated possession, and implicated purpose and activity, (iii) the taxonomic structure of categories, (iv) cultural models, exemplified by way of our folk understanding of physical force, communication and language, and emotion and physiological reaction. (Günter Radden)
category; cognitive semantics; conceptual metaphor theory; conceptual metonymy theory; conceptual metonymy theory; conflation; continuum metonymy/metaphor; cultural model; deconflation; full metonymy; implicature; metaphor; metonymic relationsh
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o prilogu
27-x.
objavljeno
Podaci o knjizi
Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast
Dirven, René ; Ralf Pörings
Berlin : New York: Mouton de Gruyter
2002.
3-11-017373-5