Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Relationship towards Engineering, Quality Assurance and 10CFR50.59 in the Design Change Process at the Krško NPP (CROSBI ID 469104)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | stručni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Bašić, Ivica ; Krajnc, Božidar Relationship towards Engineering, Quality Assurance and 10CFR50.59 in the Design Change Process at the Krško NPP // Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids / Knapp, Vladimir ; Čavlina, Nikola (ur.). Zagreb: Hrvatsko nuklearno društvo, 1998. str. 315-322-x

Podaci o odgovornosti

Bašić, Ivica ; Krajnc, Božidar

engleski

Relationship towards Engineering, Quality Assurance and 10CFR50.59 in the Design Change Process at the Krško NPP

The paper discusses the relationship between the Krško NPP design change engineering practice, quality assurance and the USA Nuclear Regulatory Commission 10 Code Federal Rule 50.59 (10CFR50.59). Together these controls ensure that plant design bases are maintained and yield a safe design. The 10CFR50.59 has been applied in Krško NPP plant specific procedure entitled ESP-2.303 "Authorization of Changes, Tests and Experiments" (Safety Evaluation Screening) since 1994. All the proposed changes requiring Safety Evaluations are being submitted to the SNSA (Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration). If the proposed change is constituting an "Unreviewed Safety Question" the formal licensing procedure shall be completed before design change can be implemented otherwise the proposed design change is rejected. The procedure (ESP-2.303) provides the methodology to be followed in determining if a proposed activity involves an unreviewed safety question. An "Unreviewed Safety Question" is essentially the same as defined in 10CFR50.59(a)(2): "A proposed change, test or experiment shall be deemed to involve an unreviewed safety question (1) if the probability of occurrence or consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the [updated] safety analysis report may be increased; or (2) if a possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the [updated] safety analysis report may be created; or (3) if the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technical specification is reduced." The paper discusses the following Krško NPP Safety Evaluations aspects: 1. Defense in Depth Design Philosophy 2. Methodology 3. Definitions and Applicability of Terms 4. Evaluation Process Guidanceand Documentation Process 5. Krško NPP Lessons Learned

NPP Krško; design change; USA Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 10 Code Federal Rule 50.59; plant design bases; SNSA; safety evaluation

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

315-322-x.

1998.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids

Knapp, Vladimir ; Čavlina, Nikola

Zagreb: Hrvatsko nuklearno društvo

Podaci o skupu

2nd International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids

predavanje

15.06.1998-18.06.1998

Dubrovnik, Hrvatska

Povezanost rada

Elektrotehnika