Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Balancing Free Market and Social Rights in a Post-communist European State (CROSBI ID 534406)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Rodin, Siniša Balancing Free Market and Social Rights in a Post-communist European State // Ceci n'est pas une Constitution- Constitutionalism without a Constitution? European Constitutional Law Network- Series Vol. 7 / Ingolf Pernice i Evgeni Tanchev (ur.). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2008. str. 212-224

Podaci o odgovornosti

Rodin, Siniša

engleski

Balancing Free Market and Social Rights in a Post-communist European State

It is nothing new to say that the Constitution of the EU is a fragmentary one. Moreover, it is fragmentary in at least two respects. First, it is not codified and contained in a single document, or a set of documents. And the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty will not change anything in this respect. Second, it is fragmentary in the sense that it is underinclusive and covers only some elements of a fully-fledged constitutional order. The mentioned underinclusiveness enabled the European Court of Justice to gradually develop substantive constitutional law of the European Union. However, regardless of being fragmentary, the legal order of the European Union is nevertheless a constitutional order. Being so it, by necessity, affects constitutional orders of the Member States. In my presentation I will address one specific issue, namely, how the Union's constitutional order affects justiciability of fundamental rights on the national level. More specifically, I will address issues related to adjustment of the Croatian legal order to the requirements of EU membership. Similar to other post-communist European states Croatian constitutional heritage is characterised by tradition of non-justiciability of fundamental rights guarantees. Those guarantees were either absent, or, in case of social rights, unjusticiable. Indeed, while Croatia has a long pre-democratic history of social rights guarantees, experience of their exercise, especially judicial protection, in circumstances of market economy is largely absent. I will focus on Croatian constitutional foundations of proportionality in order to contrast it to the demands of EU membership. My main proposition is that the concept of public interest, as expressed by the Parliament and as interpreted by Croatian courts, typically precludes proportionality analysis. I will try to explain this phenomenon by a specific understanding of separation of powers and the role of courts. That understanding, I claim, will need to change if Croatian courts are to take their share of responsibility in balancing fundamental rights and market freedoms.

Market freedoms; proportionality; courts; social rights

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

212-224.

2008.

nije evidentirano

objavljeno

978-3-8329-4132-1

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Ceci n'est pas une Constitution- Constitutionalism without a Constitution? European Constitutional Law Network- Series Vol. 7

Ingolf Pernice i Evgeni Tanchev

Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag

Podaci o skupu

Ceci n'est pas une constitution - Constitutionalisation without a constitution

ostalo

17.04.2008-19.04.2008

Sofija, Bugarska

Povezanost rada

Pravo