Burden of proof v. intime conviction: Two strategies of explaining factual findings in court judgments (CROSBI ID 537933)
Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija
Podaci o odgovornosti
Uzelac, Alan
engleski
Burden of proof v. intime conviction: Two strategies of explaining factual findings in court judgments
The proper reasoning is an essential part of court judgments, so also the ECHR. However, when explaining factual findings, judges basically have on disposal two strategies - one based on the conviction (fr. - intime conviction), and one based on the burden of proof rules. The lecture discusses the consequences of both strategies.
civil procedure; intime conviction; burden of proof; evidence; court judgments
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o prilogu
2007.
objavljeno
Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji
Podaci o skupu
Ius Commune Conference: Civil Procedure Workshop
pozvano predavanje
29.11.2007-30.11.2007
Liège, Belgija