Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Diversity and Language Liminality (CROSBI ID 541283)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Sujoldžić, Anita Diversity and Language Liminality // Book of Abstracts - 10th Biennial EASA (European Association of Social Anthropologists) Conference: Experiencing Diversity and Mutuality (Ljubljana, Slovenija. 26-29.08.2008.) / Mesarič, Andreja ; Repič, Jaka ; Bartulović, Alenka (ur.). Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani, 2008. str. 50-51

Podaci o odgovornosti

Sujoldžić, Anita

engleski

Diversity and Language Liminality

European discourse on diversity is closely linked to the celebration of multilingualism as a proclaimed European language policy. However, the concept is shaped by language ideologies which reveal its complex nature and contradictory discourses emerging from the power relations between majority and minority communities at subnational, national and supranational levels. Much of the linguistic or sociolinguistic work on language still comes from within the discourse tied to the Herderian view that language, identity, community and/or nation are inextricably linked. Along with these ‘ naturalised’ assumptions which often frame language policy, language is culturally constructed as liminality, a bounded, countable entity, which does not confront complex histories and issues of mixture and hybridity. Backed up by widespread standardization ideology the liminal concept of multilingualism has hegemonic effects on language users excluding numerous non-standardized varieties or variable and partial proficiencies in multiple languages. The opposing political implications are manifested by both horizontal (e.g. diasporization, regionalization, and nationalization) and vertical polarizations (elites/non-elites) that reflect relationships of power and unequal position of various groups in Europe. The resulting tensions emerge at supranational level e.g. in desire to protect Europe’ s linguistic heritage (more than 40 native languages), in spite of the fact that most– spoken first foreign language in Europe is English, and that various immigrant groups’ languages are not protected by national policies. At the national level, along with the tension between monolingual state and multilingual European ideal, the homogenizing standardization ideology at the same time produces vertical, structural heterogeneity. The paper examines how at the regional level the articulations of these different discourses are reflected on scientific knowledge, language policy and commonsense knowledge of people living on the ‘ border’ of Europe in the liminal zone of Istria, through processes of both vertical and horizontal polarization, mediated by cultural legacies, economic factors and language proficiencies.

anthropology; Istria; language; liminality

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

50-51.

2008.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Mesarič, Andreja ; Repič, Jaka ; Bartulović, Alenka

Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani

987-961-237-247-7

Podaci o skupu

10th Biennial EASA (European Association of Social Anthropologists) Conference, Experiencing Diversity and Mutuality

predavanje

26.08.2008-29.08.2008

Ljubljana, Slovenija

Povezanost rada

Etnologija i antropologija