Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Microleakage evaluation of composite restoratives (CROSBI ID 475028)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Simeon, Paris ; Pevalek, Jasmika ; Jukić, Silvana ; Prskalo, Katica ; Šutalo, Jozo ; Anić, Ivica Microleakage evaluation of composite restoratives // Journal of Dental Research / Herzberg, Mark C. (ur.). Alexandria (VA): IADR: International and American Association for Dental Research, 2000. str. 534-534-x

Podaci o odgovornosti

Simeon, Paris ; Pevalek, Jasmika ; Jukić, Silvana ; Prskalo, Katica ; Šutalo, Jozo ; Anić, Ivica

engleski

Microleakage evaluation of composite restoratives

Almost total understanding of microleakage was obtained using the method of extracting the filling out of the cavity and observing the pattern of dye leakage. The aim of this study was to evaluate three restorative systems by observing microleakage using this method. Fortyeight intact premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons have received buccal cervical cavities of uniform dimensions. Teeth were divided in four groups of twelve and restored (Group 1 - T.P.H. + Prime&Bond 2.0. ; Group 2 - Heliomolar + Syntac S.C. ; Group 3 - Tetric + Syntac S.C. ; control group 4 - Fuji II LC). Teeth were thermocycled, protected with wax, immersed in acid resistant ink (Rotring Ink) for 24 hours, then immersed in 5% nitric acid (3 days) until softened enough to pull the fillings out of their cavities. Leakage pattern was observed on extracted fillings and maximal depth of leakage (scores or levels from 0 to 4) was measured through a dissecting microscope. Results show that leakage occurred at levels 1 and 2 in Group 1 in 10/12 specimen (83.3%), in Group 2 in 4/12 (33.3%), in Group 3 in 2/12 specimen (16.6%) and in Group 4 in 8/12 (58.3%). Differences between Groups 1 and 4 were not statistically significant (P<0.05). Differences between Groups 2 and Groups 3 and 4 were not statistically significant (P<0.05). Differences between Groups 3 and 4 were statistically significant (P<0.05). Although differences between some groups were significant to evaluate certain material further investigation should be performed using this method of investigation.

microleakage; evaluation; restoratives

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

534-534-x.

2000.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Journal of Dental Research

Herzberg, Mark C.

Alexandria (VA): IADR: International and American Association for Dental Research

Podaci o skupu

78th General Session od IADR

poster

05.04.2000-08.04.2000

Sjedinjene Američke Države

Povezanost rada

Dentalna medicina