Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

The quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory practice in some less developed European countries and Mexico – multicentric study (CROSBI ID 173486)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Šimundić, Ana-Maria ; Bilić-Zulle, Lidija ; Nikolac, Nora ; Šupak-Smolčić, Vesna ; Honović, Lorena ; Avram, Sanja ; Beregovaja, Elena ; Dobreanu, Minodora ; Guimaraes, Joao-Tiago ; Kovacs, Gabor L. et al. The quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory practice in some less developed European countries and Mexico – multicentric study // Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 49 (2011), 2; 215-228

Podaci o odgovornosti

Šimundić, Ana-Maria ; Bilić-Zulle, Lidija ; Nikolac, Nora ; Šupak-Smolčić, Vesna ; Honović, Lorena ; Avram, Sanja ; Beregovaja, Elena ; Dobreanu, Minodora ; Guimaraes, Joao-Tiago ; Kovacs, Gabor L. ; Majkić Singh, Nada ; Sierra-Amor, Rosa Isabel ; Sypniewska, Grazyna ; Zima, Tomas

engleski

The quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory practice in some less developed European countries and Mexico – multicentric study

This cross-sectional multicentric survey study aimed to assess the quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory activities in some developing European countries and Mexico. We assessed the quality of the extra-analytical practices in participating laboratories regarding the: a) sample acceptance criteria ; b) phlebotomy procedures ; c) test results reporting and d) recording nonconformities. Survey was performed during the April-May 2009. A total of 15 clinical laboratories from the following countries were included: Bosnia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine. Questions were scored (scores from 1-4) and average scores was calculated for each category. The overall score for all respondents (N=443) was 3.10±0.33. The average score was 3.11±0.56 for sample acceptance criteria, 2.76±0.58 for phlebotomy and 3.34±0.53, for test results reporting (F=116.49 ; P<0.001). Laboratory accreditation was associated with better practices and higher overall quality of the extra-analytical procedures (F=16.62 ; P<0.001). Moreover, highest scores for sample acceptance criteria (F=8.32 ; P<0.001), phlebotomy procedures (F=13.28 ; P<0.001) and for reporting nonconformities (F=33.62 ; P<0.001) were observed for accredited laboratories or laboratories under preparation for accreditation. The overall quality of the extra-analytical practices in countries in this survey is not satisfactory. Phlebotomy practices are the most critical extra-analytical activity. Since laboratory accreditation was associated with better practices and higher overall quality of the extra-analytical procedures, we believe that the most significant improvement could be made by implementing the total quality management system and standardizing the laboratory procedures.

errors; extra-analytical quality; laboratory testing; quality; survey

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

49 (2)

2011.

215-228

objavljeno

1434-6621

Povezanost rada

Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Indeksiranost