Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Why is retrieval expensive?: An analysis of component-processes (CROSBI ID 581541)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Vranić, Andrea ; Tonković, Mirjana Why is retrieval expensive?: An analysis of component-processes // Proceedings of the 17th meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. San Sebastián: European Society for Cognitive Psychology, 2011. str. 177-177

Podaci o odgovornosti

Vranić, Andrea ; Tonković, Mirjana

engleski

Why is retrieval expensive?: An analysis of component-processes

Research shows that division of attention during retrieval affects memory performance only minimally. This relative immunity of episodic retrieval is offset by a cost, as measured by the concurrent secondary task in a divided attention paradigm. This experiment was conducted with the aim of further exploring this relative immunity and the attentional costs associated with what seems to be obligatory retrieval processes. More specifically, we aimed at exploring the attentional cost associated with each of three retrieval component-processes: 1) cue-encoding, 2) cue elaboration, 3) retrieval mode (Tulving, 1983). A componential analysis, as introduced by Naveh-Benjamin et al. (2000), was employed to assess attentional demands of four different retrieval tasks: two tapping the episodic and two tapping the semantic memory system. Furthermore, within each of these „system tasks“, one task was data-driven and one was conceptually-driven, as proposed by the transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) approach. Our results show a similar pattern of attentional costs of the three retrieval component-processes, across various types of retrieval. The cue elaboration was found to be the most attention demanding of the three component-processes, and also this process was shown to demand significantly more attention in the non-TAP situation. These findings are interpreted within the TAP framework.

retrieval; attentional cost; transfer appropriate processing

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

177-177.

2011.

nije evidentirano

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Proceedings of the 17th meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology

San Sebastián: European Society for Cognitive Psychology

Podaci o skupu

17th meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology

poster

29.09.2011-02.10.2011

Donostia-San Sebastián, Španjolska

Povezanost rada

Psihologija