Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Decisional Conflict and Vaccine Uptake: Cross-Sectional Study of 2012/2013 Influenza Season in Croatia (CROSBI ID 208509)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Pavličević, Ivančica ; Škrabić, Slavica ; Malički, Mario ; Merčep, Ana Hrvojka ; Marušić, Ana ; Marušić, Matko. Decisional Conflict and Vaccine Uptake: Cross-Sectional Study of 2012/2013 Influenza Season in Croatia // Archives of Medical Science, 11 (2015), 4; 788-795. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.53299

Podaci o odgovornosti

Pavličević, Ivančica ; Škrabić, Slavica ; Malički, Mario ; Merčep, Ana Hrvojka ; Marušić, Ana ; Marušić, Matko.

engleski

Decisional Conflict and Vaccine Uptake: Cross-Sectional Study of 2012/2013 Influenza Season in Croatia

Background and objectives: As scientific, media and individual opinions on the need for seasonal influenza vaccination differ, we explored patients’ decisional conflict and perceived physician and social support when making vaccination choice. Methods: We conducted a survey of patients with previous vaccination experience in a single family medicine office in Split, Croatia. The questionnaire included decisional conflict scale, perceived social support, and attitudes and knowledge toward vaccination. Results: Out of 203 (86%) adult patients with previous vaccination experience, 182 (40.4%) opted to vaccinate in the current season, 98 (48.3%) refused, and 22 (11.3%) were undecided. The median decisional conflict score was highest among those undecided (43.8 out of maximum 100, interquartile range (IQR) 33.2–52.3), lowest among those opting to vaccinate (17.2, IQR 9.4– 26.6), and intermediate among those who refused vaccination (25.0, IQR17.2–39.1) (P<0.001, Kruskall Wallis test and post-hoc Mann-Whitney U test). Most common self-reported reasons for vaccination were previous vaccination experience (n=85, 42%) and media information (n=62, 30%). Those who refused vaccination felt less satisfied with the support they received from their family physician than those who decided to vaccinate (median 6.5 (IQR 0–9) vs. 9 (IQR 5–10) on a scale from 0–10), respectively ; P=0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Conclusions: Higher decisional conflict of patients who refuse influenza vaccination and those undecided, alongside their perceived low support of the family physician in making that choice, emphasize the importance family doctors play in advising and helping patients make informed decisions about seasonal influenza vaccination.

conflict (psychology) ; decision making ; physicians ; family

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

11 (4)

2015.

788-795

objavljeno

1734-1922

1896-9151

10.5114/aoms.2015.53299

Povezanost rada

Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost