Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

The AG: Bringing Clarity to ECJ Decisions? A Case Study of Age Discrimination Cases (CROSBI ID 210939)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad

Ćapeta, Tamara The AG: Bringing Clarity to ECJ Decisions? A Case Study of Age Discrimination Cases // The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies, 14 (2011), 563-586

Podaci o odgovornosti

Ćapeta, Tamara

engleski

The AG: Bringing Clarity to ECJ Decisions? A Case Study of Age Discrimination Cases

The question at the centre of focus in this chapter is whether the Advocate Generals’ (AGs’) Opinions contribute to the clarity of the Court’s decisions and thus increase its legitimacy. Methodologically, it analyses the cases of Mangold and Kücükdeveci and the pertaining AGs’ Opinions. It also looks at the Opinions of other AGs in other cases that commented upon either of these two judgments. It concludes that due to the lack of response by the Court to the arguments offered by its AGs, their Opinions have a very weak capacity to clarify unreasoned parts of the judgment to the general public beyond the Court. Thus the only real beneficiary of the Opinions is the academic community.

Advocate General ; Court of Justice of the EU ; legitimacy ; judgments

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

14

2011.

563-586

objavljeno

1528-8870

2049-7636

Povezanost rada

Pravo

Poveznice
Indeksiranost