Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test (CROSBI ID 237130)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Erceg, Nikola ; Bubić, Andreja One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test // Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29 (2017), 3; 381-392. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004

Podaci o odgovornosti

Erceg, Nikola ; Bubić, Andreja

engleski

One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test

Although the cognitive reflection test (CRT) represents a frequently used instrument within the field of judgement and decision-making, its scope and detailed characteristics are still not well understood. Therefore, the present article discusses 5 different ways of scoring the CRT that include the regular CRT scoring procedure (CRT-Regular), adding up the intuitive answers (CRT-Intuitive), calculating the proportion of intuitive in total incorrect answers (CRT-Proportion Intuitive), scoring only non-intuitive answers irrespective of their correctness (CRT-Reflection) and calculating the proportion of correct in total non-intuitive answers (CRT-Calculation). We conducted 2 studies aimed at investigating the associations among these scoring techniques and their relationships with thinking dispositions, specifically the need for cognition, faith in intuition, superstitious thinking, maximising and post-choice regret. The results indicate that thinking dispositions play a modest role in explaining the performance on the CRT. The specific associations among the investigated dispositions and different CRT scoring techniques are discussed.

Cognitive reflection, faith in intuition, maximising, need for cognition ; regretthinking dispositions

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

29 (3)

2017.

381-392

objavljeno

2044-5911

10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004

Povezanost rada

Psihologija

Poveznice
Indeksiranost