crta
Hrvatska znanstvena Sekcija img
bibliografija
3 gif
 Home
 About the project
 FAQ
 Contact
4 gif
Browsing
Basic search
Advanced search
Statistical data
Other bibliographies
Similar projects
 Catalogues and databases

Bibliographic record number: 993161

Journal

Authors: Munivrana Vajda, Maja
Title: THE TRUST IS NOT BLIND – REVIEWING THE IDEA OF MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU IN THE CONTEXT OF CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION AND NE BIS IN IDEM PRINCIPLE
Source: EU AND COMPARATIVE LAW ISSUES AND CHALLENGES SERIES / Duić, Dunja ; Petrašević, Tunjica (ed). - Osijek : Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek , 2018. 323-337 (ISBN: 978-953-8109-25-6).
ISSN: 2459-9425
Meeting: EU LAW IN CONTEXT – ADJUSTMENT TO MEMBERSHIP AND CHALLENGES OF THE ENLARGEMENT
Location and date: Osijek, Hrvatska, 14-15.06.2018.
Keywords: positive conflicts of jurisdiction, extraterritorial jurisdiction, ne bis in idem, parallel proceedings, mutual trust, AFSJ
Abstract:
This paper will deal with the positive conflicts of jurisdiction in the EU. At the outset, as an introduction, it will seek to identify the reasons which may lead to positive conflicts of jurisdiction in the EU and explain why such conflicts may create problems on different levels ; foremost for concerned individuals, who may face prosecutions in different states, but also for the efficiency of judiciary of the member states and the rule of law in the EU. The existing legal framework has so far remained unsuccessful in addressing this issue, although several initiatives have tried to provide some guiding principles and solutions aimed at avoiding positive conflicts within the joint Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Despite these efforts, to date the only binding mechanism which can conclusively settle conflicts of jurisdictions in the EU is the ne bis in idem principle. The issue of ne bis in idem has received a lot of scholarly attention, so the purpose of this paper is not to analyze the transnational application of ne bis in idem principle in detail, as this has been done elsewhere, but to look at the most recent decisions of the CJEU. Some of these decisions cast doubt on the idea of mutual trust on which this principle lies. Furthermore, this mechanism is far from perfect and there are many problems surrounding its application, indicating that conflicts of jurisdiction should be solved in another, more principled and forward looking manner. The paper will conclude with the set of proposals for preventing and solving conflicts of jurisdictions and assessment of their viability.
Citation databases: Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science & Humanities (CPCI-SSH) (sastavni dio Web of Science Core Collectiona)
Type of meeting: Predavanje
Type of presentation in a journal: Full-text (1500 words and more)
Type of peer-review: International peer-review
Project / theme: HRZZ-IP-2013-11-8282
Original language: ENG
Category: Znanstveni
Research fields:
Law
URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eclic/article/view/7115
Contrib. to CROSBI by: Maja Munivrana (maja.munivrana@pravo.hr), 2. Tra. 2019. u 13:15 sati



Print version   za tiskati


upomoc
foot_4