crta
Hrvatska znanstvena Sekcija img
bibliografija
3 gif
 Naslovna
 O projektu
 FAQ
 Kontakt
4 gif
Pregledavanje radova
Jednostavno pretraživanje
Napredno pretraživanje
Skupni podaci
Upis novih radova
Upute
Ispravci prijavljenih radova
Ostale bibliografije
Slični projekti
 Bibliografske baze podataka

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 198853

Zbornik radova

Autori: Ćubela Adorić, Vera
Naslov: Belief in a Just World and Responses to Injustice in Various Domains
Izvornik: 7th Alps-Adria Conference in Psychology, Abstracts / Manenica, Ilija (ur.). - Zadar : Department of Psychology, University of Zadar , 2005. 34.
Skup: 7th Alps-Adria Conference in Psychology
Mjesto i datum: Zadar, Hrvatska, 02.-04. 06. 2005.
Ključne riječi: Belief in a Just World; Responses to Injustice
Sažetak:
In a series of studies with Croatian students and adults, the relationships between various cognitive and emotional responses to self-reported and observed unfair outcomes were examined in different domains (vocational, academic, intimate relationships). The main aim was to assess the predictive contribution of the structural components of justice judgments (i.e. deservingness, personal causation, intention, lack of justification) in explaining the variance of the perceived unfairness and of the intensity of negative emotional response to the outcome in various settings. This paper will focus on the patterns of the results that are obtained for the participants with high and low scores on a Belief in a Just World scale. These groups were expected to show generally similar patterns of the correlations between these variables. They should differ, however, in the absolute level of perceived unfairness (including its constitutive components) and intensity of negative emotions. This expectation is based on the general assumption that the "strong" and "weak" believers in a just world differ in the strength of the justice motive, i.e. the tendency to maintain the illusion of a just world and, consequently, to use the strategies of cognitive restructuring that help to assimilate perceived injustice. One of these strategies is the attribution of the outcome to the "victim" of injustice. Thus, another implication of this basic assumption is that, unlike the "weak" believers in a just world, the "strong" believers will show the tendency to ascribe some responsibility to the "victim" , which should also contribute to the perception of unfairness and consequent emotional response. The results provided some support for these expectations, but also suggested the limitations for the hypothesised role of the "blaming the victim" in BJW's functioning in the assimilation of injustice.
Vrsta sudjelovanja: Poster
Vrsta prezentacije u zborniku: Sažetak
Vrsta recenzije: Međunarodna recenzija
Projekt / tema: 0070002
Izvorni jezik: ENG
Kategorija: Znanstveni
Znanstvena područja:
Psihologija



  Verzija za printanje   za tiskati


upomoc
foot_4