crta
Hrvatska znanstvena Sekcija img
bibliografija
3 gif
 Naslovna
 O projektu
 FAQ
 Kontakt
4 gif
Pregledavanje radova
Jednostavno pretraživanje
Napredno pretraživanje
Skupni podaci
Upis novih radova
Upute
Ispravci prijavljenih radova
Ostale bibliografije
Slični projekti
 Bibliografske baze podataka

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 330757

Zbornik radova

Autori: Takšić, Vladimir; Mohorić, Tamara
Naslov: On the scoring problem in the Perception of affective content test
Izvornik: 18. dani Ramira i Zorana Bujasa - Program i sažeci priopćenja / Keresteš, Gordana ; Brković, Irma ; Butković, Ana (ur.). - Zagreb : Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb , 2007. 57-57 (ISBN: 978-953-175-302-9).
Skup: 18. dani Ramira i Zorana Bujasa (18th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days)
Mjesto i datum: Zagreb, Hrvatska, 13-15.12.2007.
Ključne riječi: expert scoring; consensus scoring; target scoring; Perception of affective content test
Sažetak:
Emotional intelligence (EI) is defined as the ability to perceive and express emotion, assimilate emotion in thought, understand and reason with emotion, and regulate emotion in the self and others (Mayer and Salovey, 1997). A major issue for ability-based measures EI is the « ; ; problem of the correct answer» ; ; . Emotion-based systems have no absolute algorithm to determine the correct answer. There are three possible sources in searching for correct answers: experts (in the field of EI - expert scoring), a group of participants (consensus scoring), and the creator of the items (target scoring). Ability-based EI tests are most commonly scored by consensus. Five different scoring methods have been used for both scoring criteria (expert and consensus): (1) proportion, (2) mode, (3) lenient mode, (4) distance, and (5) adjusted distance. Final scores in Test of accuracy in perception of affective content (TOESS ; Takšić, Arar & Molander, 2004) were calculated according to all five methods for deriving possible correct answer, and according to experts, consensus and target criteria. Twelve different « ; ; correct answers» ; ; were compared with each other. Results have showed as follows: (a) only distance as a scoring method has appropriate reliabilities in both expert and consensus scoring, (b) higher correlations are found among different methods of scoring according to expert criteria, and (c) target criteria are found to have higher correlations with expert than with consensus criteria. As conclusion it could be claimed that when Likert scales are used to determine correct answers in EI ability measure, experts criteria and distance as a scoring method are found to be the most reliable and valid method.
Vrsta sudjelovanja: Predavanje
Vrsta prezentacije u zborniku: Sažetak
Vrsta recenzije: Međunarodna recenzija
Projekt / tema: 009-0342618-2657
Izvorni jezik: ENG
Kategorija: Znanstveni
Znanstvena područja:
Psihologija
Upisao u CROSBI: trukavina@ffri.hr (trukavina@ffri.hr), 24. Tra. 2008. u 12:13 sati



Verzija za printanje   za tiskati


upomoc
foot_4