Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Oprostiti ili ne oprostiti? Vjerovanja o prednostima i nedostacima opraštanja, motivacija za opraštanje i subjektivna dobrobit (CROSBI ID 583846)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Jurčec, Lana ; Kopačević, Diana Oprostiti ili ne oprostiti? Vjerovanja o prednostima i nedostacima opraštanja, motivacija za opraštanje i subjektivna dobrobit // Review of Psychology: Abstracts from the 9th Alps Adria Psychology Conference / Buško, Vesna (ur.). Jasrebarsko: Naklada Slap, 2010. str. 164-165

Podaci o odgovornosti

Jurčec, Lana ; Kopačević, Diana

engleski

Oprostiti ili ne oprostiti? Vjerovanja o prednostima i nedostacima opraštanja, motivacija za opraštanje i subjektivna dobrobit

The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between beliefs about costs and benefits of forgiveness, motivation to forgive and well-being. The sample consisted of 150 adults (88 females and 62 males), aged from 20 to 62. The scale for measuring beliefs about costs and benefits of forgiveness (CBFS) was specially developed for this study. Beliefs about benefits of forgiveness included benefits for oneself and benefits for the relationship, while costs were related to beliefs that if forgiven offender would not learn to change his/her behaviour and that it can be dangerous for forgivers. Motivation to forgive was measured by TRIM Inventory consisting of three scales – revenge, avoidance and benevolence motivation. Well-being was measured by Life satisfaction scale and PANAS (measuring positive and negative affect). Regression analyses revealed that a significant positive predictor of life satisfaction was the belief, that forgiving benefits the relationship, while the belief that forgiving can be dangerous for the forgiver was negatively related to life satisfaction. A significant positive predictor of negative affect was the belief, that forgiving can be dangerous for the forgiver, while the belief, that forgiving benefits the relationship was negatively related to negative affect. It seems that believing in benefits of forgiveness rather than in costs can improve our well-being by increasing life satisfaction and lowering negative affect.

forgiveness; beliefs; well-being

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

164-165.

2010.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Review of Psychology: Abstracts from the 9th Alps Adria Psychology Conference

Buško, Vesna

Jasrebarsko: Naklada Slap

Podaci o skupu

9th Alps-Adria Psychology Conference

predavanje

16.09.2010-18.09.2010

Klagenfurt, Austrija

Povezanost rada

Psihologija