Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Gender Differences in Validity Scales of Personality Measuring Instruments in Psychiatric Patients (CROSBI ID 222446)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Sindik, Joško ; Pavelić Tremac, Ana ; Kovačević, Dražen Gender Differences in Validity Scales of Personality Measuring Instruments in Psychiatric Patients // Collegium antropologicum, 39 (2015), 2; 335-344

Podaci o odgovornosti

Sindik, Joško ; Pavelić Tremac, Ana ; Kovačević, Dražen

engleski

Gender Differences in Validity Scales of Personality Measuring Instruments in Psychiatric Patients

The main goal of the study was to determine gender differences in validity scales of personality measuring instruments, among the psychiatric patients. Additional goals are to fi nd the differences among male and female psychiatric patients, in relation to their age group, education level and type of psychiatric diagnosis. A total of 331 male and 331 female participants (psychiatric patients) are examined, classifi ed by the categories of diagnosis, as following: Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders (F20-F29), Mood (affective) disorders (F30-F39) ; Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders neurotic, (F40-F48) and Disorders of adult personality and behavior (F60-F69). Four control scales are applied: Lie Scale (MMPIL or L scale), Scale of bizarre and confusing thinking (MMPIF or F scale) K scale of Defensiveness (MMPIK), together with Bias-scale in Plutchik’s Emotion Profi le Index (EPI). Three-factorial MANOVA was used in the analysis of the main effects, while non-parametric tests in the analysis of differences for each independent variable. Results reflect characteristic statistically significant gender differences in validity scales of personality measuring instruments, in most of the independent variables (the main effects are found for the level of education and age group). These results were interpreted within the theoretical framework of simulation and dissimulation.

dissimulation ; psychiatric diagnosis ; response bias ; simulation

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

39 (2)

2015.

335-344

objavljeno

0350-6134

Povezanost rada

Temeljne medicinske znanosti, Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Psihologija

Indeksiranost