Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Analytic thinking and the endorsement of psychological misconceptions (CROSBI ID 653729)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Bajšanski, Igor ; Žauhar, Valnea ; Valerjev, Pavle Analytic thinking and the endorsement of psychological misconceptions // Current Trends in Psychology 2017 - Book of Abstracts. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu, 2017. str. 93-93

Podaci o odgovornosti

Bajšanski, Igor ; Žauhar, Valnea ; Valerjev, Pavle

engleski

Analytic thinking and the endorsement of psychological misconceptions

Analytic thinking style is related to various beliefs and attitudes, including religious disbelief and scepticism toward paranormal and pseudoscientific beliefs (Pennycook, Fugelsang& Koehler, 2015). In this study we examined the relationship between analytic (vs. intuitive) thinking style and the endorsement of psychological misconceptions among psychology students. A total of 365 undergraduate and graduate psychology students from four universities participated in the study. Actively Open-minded Thinking scale, Need for Cognition scale and Epistemic Preference Indicator were used as measures of thinking styles. Students also completed a 64-item questionnaire about psychological misconceptions and rated their confidence for each answer. Finally, the Paranormal Belief Scale was used. It included three subscales: superstitious beliefs, religious beliefs and paranormal beliefs. The results revealed that graduate students endorsed less misconceptions than undergraduate students (t(327) = 12.68, p < .01) , and that they were less overconfident (t(323) = 5.88, p < .01). However, students were generally overconfident about their performance on the misconceptions questionnaire. The endorsement of psychological misconceptions was strongly related to overconfidence (r = .80, p < .01 for undergraduate students, r = .78, p < .01 for graduate students). This result provides a clear evidence for Dunning-Kruger effect in this domain: the less students know about psychological misconceptions, the more they overestimate their knowledge. Three measures of analytic style were negatively correlated with the endorsement of psychological misconceptions in both undergraduate and graduate students (correlations coefficients ranged from -.20 to -.47). Paranormal beliefs were positively correlated with the endorsement of misconceptions, and negatively to analytic thinking style. The possible sources of the relationship between thinking styles and the endorsement of psychological misconceptions were discussed, as well as the theoretical and practical implications of the obtained results.

analytic thinking, overconfidence, psychological misconceptions

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

93-93.

2017.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Current Trends in Psychology 2017 - Book of Abstracts

Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu

978-86-6065-434-4

Podaci o skupu

Savremeni trendovi u psihologiji-2017

predavanje

01.01.2017-01.01.2017

Novi Sad, Srbija

Povezanost rada

Psihologija