crta
Hrvatska znanstvena Sekcija img
bibliografija
3 gif
 Naslovna
 O projektu
 FAQ
 Kontakt
4 gif
Pregledavanje radova
Jednostavno pretraživanje
Napredno pretraživanje
Skupni podaci
Upis novih radova
Upute
Ispravci prijavljenih radova
Ostale bibliografije
Slični projekti
 Bibliografske baze podataka

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 932229

Zbornik radova

Autori: Dujmović, Marin; Valerjev, Pavle
Naslov: A person, a dog, and a vase: The effect of avatar type in a perspective taking task
Izvornik: XXIV Naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologijiBeograd : Institut za psihologiju, Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu , 2018. 27-28.
Skup: XXIV Naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji
Mjesto i datum: Beograd, Srbija, 23-25.03.2018.
Ključne riječi: mentalizing, perspective taking, dot perspective task, visual attention
Sažetak:
Recent research has shown people are capable of automatic processing of what another person sees even when not explicitly taking the other persons perspective. This has been concluded based on studies conducted using the dot perspective task. In this task participants are cued the perspective (self/other) from which they are viewing stimuli (dots) and the number of stimuli. They are then asked to decide whether the cued number of stimuli can be seen from the cued perspective. Results show people are slower in their responses when a different number of stimuli can be seen from one's own and the avatar’s (other) perspective. In these incongruent trials the avatar's perspective interferes with the response about one’s own perspective, and one’s own perspective interferes with the response about the avatar's perspective. This indicates both perspectives are processed automatically. However, question remains whether this is purely a consequence of perceptual cueing or if social information contributes to the effect. The goal of 28 our study was to investigate differences in automatic processing depending on the species of the avatar in the task. The experiment was a 2 (self/other perspective) × 2 (same/different number of stimuli seen from the two perspectives) × 2 (person/dog avatar) repeated measures design. In a modified dot perspective task we instructed participants to respond as fast as possible with the number of stimuli (1 or 2) which could be seen from a previously cued perspective (self/other). Results from a three-way ANOVA showed participants (N=33) responded slower for incongruent trials (F(1, 32)=15.25, p<.01, ηp2=.32), and when taking the other perspective (F(1, 32)=11.40, p<.01, ηp2=.26). However, the avatar species by perspective interaction was also significant (F(1, 32)=13.04, p<.01, ηp2=.29). Post-hoc comparisons showed participants were significantly slower when taking a person’s perspective compared to their own, this difference was not significant when taking a dog’s perspective compared to their own. These results may imply additional time is required to take the perspective of a human being while the perspective of a dog represents a perceptive cue rather than requiring that additional step. We may conclude both perceptual and social information contribute to perspective taking. However, as expected, the contribution of social information varies depending on the type of avatar.
Vrsta sudjelovanja: Predavanje
Vrsta prezentacije u zborniku: Sažetak
Vrsta recenzije: Međunarodna recenzija
Izvorni jezik: ENG
Kategorija: Znanstveni
Znanstvena područja:
Psihologija
URL Internet adrese: http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018-program-EIP.pdf
Upisao u CROSBI: Pavle Valerjev (valerjev@unizd.hr), 26. Ožu. 2018. u 08:39 sati



Verzija za printanje   za tiskati


upomoc
foot_4